5 tax breaks to help offset child-rearing costs
IRS, state and local officials looking into alleged tax software efforts to sideline Free File

Diverse D.C. policy groups urge end to tax extenders

Around two dozen tax breaks are now in a legislative zombie state, much like these creatures in George Romero's classic zombie film "Night of the Living Dead." The tax versions are waiting for federal lawmakers to bring them back to life or finally and completely put an end to them. (Photo via Wikimedia Commons)

A dozen groups spanning the political spectrum are urging Congress to let zombie tax extenders remain dead.

Are you still waiting on expired tax provisions to be resurrected?

If a motley crew of public policy, tax and advocacy groups get its way, you'll be waiting forever.

Anti-extenders effort continuing: Twelve organizations and think tanks representing deficit hawks, right-wing groups that want less taxation and left-leaners seeking more progressive taxation changes to the Internal Revenue Code are united on one thing.

They all think the around two dozen tax breaks that expired at the end of 2017 (and the handful that were renewed for just 2018 and then evaporated again) should remain dead and gone.

"Though our organizations span the political spectrum, we all agree that it is time to stop making tax policy one year at a time. Bringing back these temporary tax giveaways, particularly on a retroactive basis after most Americans have already filed their taxes, is bad tax, fiscal, and economic policy," said the groups in the letter sent to House and Senate leaders and tax-writing committees.

The signatories are the leaders of, in alphabetical order, Americans for Prosperity; Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget; Competitive Enterprise Institute's Center for Energy and Environment; Concord Coalition; Economic Policy Institute; Freedom Partners; FreedomWorks; Heritage Action; Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy; Progressive Policy Institute's Center for Funding America's Future; Tax March; and U.S. PIRG.

Tax and public policy groups urge end to extenders_logos only

Planned impermanence: These expired tax provisions are known as extenders. The nickname comes from the fact that they technically are temporary tax provisions that must be periodically renewed or, as the groups' letter writers want, expire.

Over the years, most of the extenders have been renewed. Eventually.

Sometimes, though, it takes federal lawmakers months (more than 12 in some cases) for them to be put back into the tax code.

Such delays, as the anti-extenders groups note, obviously cause problems for tax planning and compliance.

Now and then, an extender or two doesn't make it back. For the most part, though, they are loved by the special interests that benefit from their existence and lobby hard for their renewal.

Senate yea, House meh: This time, the Senate is more amenable to reviving the extenders. The House not so much, at least not yet.

This disconnect on Capitol Hill is giving the anti-extenders letter writers some hope that this might be the year they get their wish that the extenders remain expired.

In February, Senate Finance Committee (SFC) Chairman Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) and his across-the aisle counterpart SFC Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Oregon) introduced a bill that would renew the extenders.

Tax measures, however, must constitutionally originate in the House. And Rep. Richard Neal (D-Massachusetts), chair of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, is taking a more deliberate legislative approach.

Neal and many of his colleagues want to take a look at the tax provisions one by one and determine whether they really deserve to be part of tax and economic policy. Such inspection could doom some extenders, especially since the provisions typically slide back into law without consideration of their real costs.

Neal also has said that he wants the new Democrats on Ways and Means to get a solid handle on the provisions, many of which are obscure and specific, such as motorsports facilities improvements, horse racing depreciation schedules, a variety of fuel-related breaks (biodiesel, solar, fuel cells) and even entertainment production companies.

Over the many, many years, these have for the most part been rubber-stamped back into law. Fresh legislative eyes could offer new takes on whether the expired tax breaks should be renewed.

Just say no: There's no vacillation by the dozen groups who wrote Neal, Grassley and Wyden, as well as Ways and Means Ranking Member Kevin Brady (R-Texas), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-California), House Republican Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-California), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York).

They urge the Senators and Representatives "to ignore calls from special interests to revive these zombie extenders. Let what is dead remain dead."

"While our groups differ on what future tax policy should look like, we all agree that it is time to end the practice of passing and extending costly temporary tax provisions," according to the letter.

Instead, they say, U.S. taxpayers deserve "fair and stable tax, fiscal, and economic policy. Tax extenders don't pass muster."

Do you agree that tax extenders are not worth their tortuous legislative path and trouble they create? Or do you depend on one or more of these tax breaks to help lower your annual tax bill and want it/them back now?

You also might find these other posts of interest:





Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.