Dueling tax calculators: Vox & The Nation face off over presidential candidate tax proposal costs, benefits
The presidential candidates are duking it out for their parties' nomination, with things heating up on both the Democratic and Republican sides as the hopefuls look to New York's primary.
So far The Donald and Cruz and Hillary and Bernie haven't gone head-to-head over their tax plans. A couple of publications, however, are facing off, over ways to calculate what we'd pay under their various tax proposals.
Figures don't lie, but…: Last month, Vox published a candidates' tax calculator that it created in conjunction with the Tax Policy Center (TPC). The folks at Vox and TPC made it clear that their calculator was a basic one just to give folks an idea of where they'd come out under the candidates' tax proposals.
Now, however, The Nation is taking issue with that calculator, calling it "wildly misleading" and offering one of its own.
According to The Nation, the Vox/TPC calculator:
oes not show how your overall economic situation might change under each candidate's policy agenda. What it presents is a number Vox calls "your tax liability," which includes things you would never think of as part of your tax bill — like the payroll taxes your employer pays on your wage or the tax you pay on a bottle of wine. Using Vox’s approach, which draws on a narrow, but largely correct, analysis from the Tax Policy Center (TPC), simply getting a raise from your boss would look like a larger tax bill — bad news.
That means, says The Nation, the Vox/TPC calculator "overwhelmingly favors Trump and Cruz, while suggesting that Sanders’s plan would have a negative effect on disposable income for the majority of Americans."
Taxing and spending: Vox notes that because of myriad personal tax situations, its calculator's process was simplified to "consider only the biggest factors (income, marital status, and children) and only look at the four taxes with the largest impact (individual and corporate income taxes, payroll taxes, and excise taxes)."
The Nation argues that you can't count taxing without also counting spending. "axes, in other words, don’t exist in a vacuum," write Mark Paul, David Rosnick and Emily Stephens for the magazine. "What the government does with those taxes matters quite a bit."
The Nation article cites Citizens for Tax Justice data showing that under Bernie Sanders’ proposals, which tend to come out worse on the basic tax hike-vs.-increase calculation, will not only see their take-home pay increase, but also will spend less of it on things like prescriptions and student loans.
Under Hillary Clinton, things will stay largely the same, according to The Nation. Meanwhile, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz plans tend to provide individuals with more money but also will require them to spend more of it to cover government programs they plan to cut.
The Nation article details how it tweaked its candidate tax plan calculator to account for what it sees as deficiencies in the Vox/TPC online program.
Tax calculations, take 2: I tried out The Nation's calculator using the same scenario as I did with the Vox/TPC one.
My result: The trends were essentially the same, but Sanders' tax bite is greatly reduced under The Nation's computation scheme.
Here's The Nation's calculator result for a married, jointly filing couple with no children and income of $150,000:
I can see the value of both methodologies.
The Vox/TPC gives you an idea of where you'll stand from a purely tax rate standpoint.
The Nation's results show the bottom line effect when your more or less in taxes pay for more or less government services.
I suggest you run your own numbers in both calculators. Then decide which candidates' tax and government policies fit your political philosophies and finances.
You also might find these items of interest: